|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dunes City Council Approved MINUTES March 11, 2010 at 7:00 pm Printable rtf file |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Councilor Navetta requested to pull the bills of the session. Mayor Hauptman asked if anyone wanted to pull the receipts of the session and Councilor Navetta said no, the receipts of the session are just for informational purposes. Mayor Hauptman said they would move the bills of the session to be placed on the agenda after the public hearing. · Receipts of the session through 03/04/10 Councilor Ruede made the motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. Councilor Howison seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote. 6. Announcements / Correspondence Mayor Hauptman announced that the artist of the month is Norma Richter. The Mayor also announced that there are overnight closures planned for US Highway 101 at the Siuslaw River Bridge located South of Florence. The Mayor said these Highway closures would take place during the timeframe of 11:00 p.m. through 5:00 a.m. on the dates of 03/15/10 through 03/19/10. The Mayor finished his announcement by stating that volunteers are needed for the Site Review Committee, the Revenue Committee, and the Planning Commission. In regards to April being Sexual Assault Awareness Month, Mayor Hauptman announced that the city received a copy of a proclamation from the office of the Governor, Mr. Theodore Kulongoski, recognizing the compassion and dedication of the individuals who provide services to survivors of sexual violence. Mayor Hauptman said the proclamation is available to anyone who would like to read it. Mayor Hauptman said he is regretful to announce the resignation of Rob Quandt from the City Council. Councilor Koehler said during last month's Council meeting and work session, questions were raised about the process of accepting a bill for a contract about the Road Director position not approved by Council motion. Councilor Koehler said keeping to appropriate process is a very demanding course for Volunteers, Committees, Commissions, Councilors Mayor, and Staff. Councilor Koehler said he (Councilor Koehler) regrets now his (Councilor Koehler) motion, at that Council meeting may have lead to the Road Commissioner, Councilor Quandt taking this in a personal way. Councilor Koehler said after all, to some of us, this is a full time job with much time invested. Councilor Koehler said he (Councilor Koehler) would like to emphasize how much work Councilor Quandt has done for us all during the last two years, from Rob Quandt's completing road projects, creating a Roads Director position, having minutes and agenda's available to the website to Rob Quandt taking on work that others could not complete. Councilor Koehler said Rob Quandt's dedication and follow through has been quite admirable. Councilor Koehler said he (Councilor Koehler) was under the assumption that this type of contract, the Director of Roads contract, was to be presented to Council and he (Councilor Koehler) is quite sorry if Mr. Quandt left as a result of his (Councilor Koehler) false assumption. Councilor Koehler moved to not accept Councilor Quandt's resignation. Councilor Navetta seconded the motion. Mayor Hauptman said if Rob Quandt watches this meeting on television, maybe he would come back. Mayor Hauptman said at this point the City does have an opening on the Council and the City would like applicants. Mayor Hauptman said the cut off for applications is March 28th, 2010. Councilor Mills said although she (Councilor Mills) would really like to have Rob back, she (Councilor Mills) respects his position and will not be voting in favor of the motion. The motion to not accept Councilor Quandt's resignation passed by vote of 4 ayes and 1 nay with Councilor Mills voting nay. 7. Citizen Input Mr. Norman Martin - 83750 Rio Drive - Florence, OR 97439 Mr. Norman Martin read a statement to the Council, which was also placed on file. Mr. Martin spoke in regards to permit number 2009029DSEMPG, which was issued to Mr. Del Riesenhuber. Mr. Martin said he is in disagreement with the continued construction and requested, if warranted, that the City issue a stop work order. Mr. David Bellemore – 83548 Salal – Florence, OR 97439 Mr. David Bellemore stated regarding the resignation of Councilor Quandt, this resignation is a sad loss to the City. Mr. Bellemore stated that Mr. Quandt is a hard working and smart person. Mr. Bellemore said the work Mr. Quandt did for the City is excellent. Mr. Bellemore said he (Mr. Bellemore) believes the controversy is a misunderstanding in communication. Mr. Bellemore said he (Mr. Bellemore) believes Mr. Quandt felt his (Mr. Quandt's) integrity had been challenged. Mr. Bellemore said the City owes Mr. Quandt a huge thank you. Mr. Troy Sathe 83550 Clear Lake Rd. Mr. Troy Sathe said when he (Mr. Sathe) previously spoke of the Road Commission Auxiliary; he used the wrong word of "Commission". Mr. Sathe said he (Mr. Sathe) would like to see a volunteer group, which focuses on Road Department projects. Mr. Sathe said these volunteers would simply only be volunteers and the volunteers would have no vote or say in any decisions. Mr. Sathe apologized for any confusion this may have brought to the Council. 8. Mayor's report Mayor Hauptman said last Thursday, the Planning Secretary, Lisa Ekelund and himself went and spoke to the Central Oregon Coast Board of Realtors. The Mayor stated that the Association had contacted the City and set up a list of questions they had for the City. The Mayor said the meeting lasted about two and a half hours. The Mayor said that he believes that all of the Association's questions were answered. The Mayor commended Lisa Ekelund for an incredible job. The Mayor said the meeting was good for both sides. The Mayor said anyone interested in building could come into City Hall and have a pre-construction conference with Lisa Ekelund. The Mayor said the City is striving to be as transparent as it possibly can and not make it a confusing issue to do business of any kind within the City. 9. Committee / Commission reports
10. Unfinished / Old business
11. New business
12. Public hearing
Councilor Navetta asked why this ordinance is declared an emergency. Amy Graham said the City Attorney stated that it specifies the quorum requirements for the Planning Commission and it can be enacted for the next Planning Commission meeting. Councilor Howison said it really does not change the reality and that calling it an emergency seems like abuse of system. Councilor Mills agrees with Councilor Howison and Councilor Navetta except that the current code is a violation of law and she (Councilor Mills) does not think they should allow that to continue. Councilor Howison moved they read Ordinance Number 205 by title only. Councilor Mills seconded. The motion passed by unanimous vote. Mayor Hauptman read Ordinance Number 205 by title only. Mayor Hauptman opened the hearing for public comment at 9:16 p.m. There was no public comment. Mayor Hauptman closed the hearing for public comment at 9:16 p.m. Councilor Howison moved they have the second reading of Ordinance Number 205 by title only. Councilor Navetta seconded. The motion passed by unanimous vote. Mayor Hauptman read Ordinance Number 205 for a second time by title only. Councilor Mills made the motion to adopt Ordinance Number 205. Councilor Koehler seconded the motion. The motion passed by roll call vote, which was as follows. Councilor Navetta - aye Councilor Koehler - aye Councilor Howison - aye Councilor Ruede - aye Councilor Mills - aye 13. Consent Agenda Amy Graham read a list of corrections for the minutes of 2/11/10, which are as follows: On page 4, second paragraph, last sentence, replace the word "Weir" with the word "permit". On page 5, first paragraph, last sentence, add a "w" to the word "rapped". On page 6, seventh paragraph, "the City" needs to be changed to "the State". On page 9, item 11, second paragraph, remove the letter "t" in front of "he". On page 11, sixth paragraph, remove the word "and". Amy Graham said there was some discussion and she (Amy Graham) actually watched the video when it came down to a vote on page 11, the motion down at the very bottom the Mayor broke the tie, technically, there was no tie the vote was 4 to 2. Amy said Councilor Mills voted aye. Councilor Mills corrected Amy Graham stating that she (Councilor Mills) voted nay so that the bill would be paid. Amy Graham said she did not know how the Council wanted to handle this. Amy asked if she should add a disclaimer stating what the vote actually was. Councilor Mills said she would like to see the minutes amended to reflect what actually happened. Councilor Ruede said she would like to see the minutes be corrected to the exact way it was done so therefore you would delete that. Councilor Howison agreed. Councilor Howison said the vote was 4 to 2 and the Mayor's vote does not need to be in the minutes unless the Mayor would like to see it in the minutes. Councilor Howison reminded Amy Graham that he spoke to her and said he would like clarification on page 11, third line from the bottom. Councilor Howison requested to insert the words "stated sarcastically" between "light" and "that". Amy Graham said Councilor Howison did contact her about his correction and she forgot to add it. Amy Graham said this is all the corrections she has at this time for the meeting minutes of 2/11/10. Amy Graham said she does have corrections for the work session. Mayor Hauptman said they would now have a motion to approve the minutes as corrected for the 02/11/10 City Council meeting. Councilor Ruede moved they approve the minutes as corrected for the 2/11/10 City Council meeting. Councilor Howison seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote. Amy Graham read a list of corrections for the minutes of 2/16/10, which are as follows: On page three, 13th paragraph, the sentence begins with "David said that the other thing they could do" add the word "is" is added after the word "do". On page three, 13th paragraph, remove the word "artisan" and the word "that". On page four, fourth paragraph, in the second sentence, add an "s" to the word "Councilor". On page 12, second to the last paragraph, delete the second "is not". On page 14, in the first line on the page, change the word "the" to "there". On page 25, ninth paragraph, "c" in "capaCity" needs to be lower case. On page nine, seventh paragraph, "managerialist" needs to be changed to "manager". Councilor Mills made the motion to approve the minutes of the work session dated 2/16/10 as corrected. Councilor Howison seconded the motion. The motion passed by vote of 4 ayes and 1 abstain with Councilor Ruede abstaining. Councilor Howison asked the Mayor if there is a way to get the technical glitches corrected before the Council receives the minutes. Mayor Hauptman said Lisa Ekelund takes the minutes but does not have the authority to make changes. The Mayor said if the Councilors could call or email in any changes to the minutes prior to the meeting, those changes could easily be emailed to the Councilors or placed on the dais and that way the Councilors would have the corrections for review prior to approval. Councilor Navetta said the Council is talking about changing and re-printing 40 pages of minutes. Councilor Navetta said another idea would be to have a one pager that acknowledges the grammatical errors, which could be stapled onto the existing minutes. Councilor Ruede said that perhaps the City Recorder could proofread these minutes and then have notes that the Council could review. Councilor Howison said the other idea would be to have a one pager that acknowledges the grammatical errors. Councilor Ruede said someone would have to proofread the minutes in order to have the one page acknowledgment. Mayor Hauptman said it is the responsibility of the City Recorder to proof the minutes for grammatical errors. Mayor Hauptman said this is something that should just automatically be done so that the Councilors do not have to do this. Mayor Hauptman asked Lisa Ekelund if spell check kicks in. Lisa Ekelund said she types the minutes in Word. Lisa said she reviews the minutes several times and runs spell check before they are forwarded to the City Recorder. Lisa said that she is honestly shocked that there are so many errors. Amy Graham said a lot of it is like the word "the", it is not a spelling error so it would not show up in spell check. Lisa Ekelund said that the word "capacity" spelled as "capaCity" would show up in spell check. Koehler asked if they could get a cost analysis on what it costs to do minutes. Councilor Koehler said Lisa does the minutes, and Amy proofs the minutes, and then the Council needs to rehash it. Councilor Koehler said the cost is getting out of hand. Councilor Howison said the minutes are very thorough. Mayor Hauptman said he is not criticizing Lisa. Mayor Hauptman said the City Recorder should proofread the minutes before they are sent out. Councilor Howison said there are different levels of programs for spell check. Councilor Howison said the program he has automatically changes the misspelled words. Lisa Ekelund said her program changes misspelled words automatically and she does not understand why these last sets of minutes had so many errors. Regarding the bills of the session, Councilor Navetta said one concern was the Building Codes Consultancy. Councilor Navetta said last month, it seemed like the fees were this high. Councilor Navetta said she is wondering what is happening. Mayor Hauptman said Lisa would be the best person to answer this question. Councilor Navetta asked if this is for Larry Lewis. Lisa Ekelund said Building Codes Consultancy is the Building Inspector and not Larry Lewis the Planning Consultant. Councilor Navetta said she does not like the attorney bill and requested that it be given to the Council in itemized form. Councilor Howison made the motion to pay the bills of the session. Councilor Mills seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote. 14. Citizen input. Judy Bedsole 4840 Summit Avenue. Mrs. Bedsole asked the council to void the temporary right-if-way use permit on Lake Blvd. and Fishmill Way. Mrs. Bedsole said the permit was processed without going through proper procedures. Mrs. Bedsole said the temporary right-of-way use permit is for a retaining wall that is 5' into the road. Mrs. Bedsole said a wall is not temporary use and it has been there for a number of years. Mrs. Bedsole said this wall interferes with her business and her customers have complained. Mrs. Bedsole said she is asking the City to revoke the temporary right-of-way use permit and open up the road. Mrs. Bedsole said the City should not have made a narrow road narrower. Mayor Hauptman asked if any Councilors had anything further to say. Councilor Navetta thanked Councilor Koehler for being the Webmaster. Councilor Koehler encouraged input of any suggestions for the website. Mayor Hauptman said Siuslaw Watershed is testing for e-coli but he does not see it on the website. Councilor Koehler said it is linked in the minutes on the Water Quality page. Councilor Mills said the Census forms should be in the mailbox. Councilor Mills said the forms have not been delivered to Dunes City yet and staff is working on making those forms available at City Hall. Councilor Koehler said the idea that they are going to be morphing with the Siuslaw Watershed Council is important and the graphs will eventually be linked with the Dunes City website. Councilor Mills asked if they could add a link to the City website that would take people to Campbell (the meeting videographer) so that people are able to find a way to watch the Council meetings. 15. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the City Council, Councilor Navetta made the motion to adjourn the meeting and Councilor Ruede seconded. The motion passed by unanimous vote. The meeting of the Dunes City Council adjourned at 9:56 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Dunes City Council is to be held on 04/08/10 at 7:00 p.m. The proceedings of the Dunes City Council meeting were recorded on tape, and are on file at Dunes City Hall. Upon approval by the City Council, these minutes will be available online at www.dunescity.com
APPROVED BY THE DUNES CITY COUNCIL ON THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2010. [ Signed copy available at City Hall ] _______________________________________ Eric Hauptman, Mayor
ATTEST: [ Signed copy available at City Hall ] _______________________________________ Fred Hilden, City Recorder
======================= Reports =======================
Conservation Committee Report, March 2010 The Conservation Committee met on 11 Feb 2010. The draft minutes are included in the packet. We had several site review visits last month. An educational pamphlet regarding protection of the shoreland and riparian areas was prepared for the upcoming newsletter and has been submitted to Councilor Navetta.
In the Month of February, I issued six permits. I attended the regular session meeting of the City Council. I typed the minutes for the regular session and the work session of the City Council. I attended and took minutes for one Planning Commission meeting. I attended at took minutes for one CCI workgroup meeting.
At the last Planning Commission meeting, the Commissioners unanimously voted to appoint Mr. David Bellemore to his second year as the Planning Chairperson. Our most recent addition to the Planning Commission, Mr. Tom Bassett, was unanimously voted in as the Planning Vice-Chairperson. To assist the Planning Commission with the code audit, I am updating the Commissioners codebooks to reflect the code changes that have taken place. Our Commissioners are eager to assist the City with this and I believe the Commissioners will offer recommendations that the Council with find to be detailed, sensible, and fair. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 25, 2010 at 6:00 p.m.
I recently attended a meeting during the first week of March with the Mayor along with many local real estate agents to update the agents on the septic ordinance, the permitting process, and the water rights applications. This educational forum was quite successful and I anticipate an assembly such as this with the local septic inspectors to be just as helpful in the near future. Report to the Council March 11, 2010
The Commission met on February 18, 2010. The focus of the meeting was the signs project for Dunes City. Since that meeting the sign proof has been presented to staff, Mayor and Councilors for comments. There is a general consensus of opinion that the sign is good and the Commission will proceed with the project. There will be a detailed article in the upcoming newsletter that will be sent to all Dunes City Residents. At the last council meeting, the Commission received approval to pursue a possible project for grant funding that entails purchase of the properties adjacent to city hall. We have contacted a local realtor to help with this. At this time, I have no new news to report on that project. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Ruede, Councilor PRC Chair
Road Commission Report for the City Council meeting on 3/11/10 The Road Commission did not have a meeting in the month of February, however they did hold a meeting on March 8, 2010 and have scheduled a second meeting for March 22, 2010. The regularly scheduled meeting has been cancelled for March 15, 2010. At the March 8 meeting, Vice-Chairmen Curran chaired the meeting since the Commission is without a Chair at this time. The Commission started work on the 2010-2011 budget and will be finishing it at their next meeting. The Commission made a recommendation to have the City Council authorize the closure of the City County Road Partnership fund for the upcoming budget year and transfer the remaining funds to the State Street fund. The Road Commission also discussed Ordinance 149 and Chapter 32 of the Dunes City code and is making a recommendation to the City Council to amend both, to remove the Director of Roads as the Chair of the meeting in the absence of the Chairman and to establish a Vice-Chair and have the Vice-Chair, chair the meetings in the absence of the Chairman. The Road Commission also discussed the road work to be done on Lake Blvd and is recommending the City Council accept George Burke’s easement in order to enable the City to move ahead with the repairs on Lake Blvd. The Road Commission is also recommending the City Council approve a draft resolution to approve a towing ordinance for the City which would validate the proposed Courtesy Notice.
Submitted by Amy Graham, City Recorder
DUNES CITY JOINT REVENUE AND ORDINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT February, 2010
The Revenue Committee met on Wednesday, February 24, 2010. The draft business license ordinance was again discussed and a few revisions made. The Committee recommendation is for Dunes City to adopt the ordinance drafted to address all businesses, but suggests the City, due to financial constraints, adopt a resolution instructing that it only implemented as to entities that conduct business related to activities covered by Title 15 of the Dunes City Code (which is land use).
The Solid Waste Collection Service License Fees draft ordinance was also reviewed and further revision made. The Committee recommends that Dunes City adopt the draft ordinance.
Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of March, 2010. __________________________________ Jamie Mills, Chairman
Note: The Site Review Committee did not meet.
WATER RIGHT ISSUES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF THE DUNES CITY COUNCIL BY THE CITY’S WATER QUALITY COMMITTEE March 11, 2010
From inception the Water Quality Committee has been involved, to varying extents, with the City’s water right permits. The City Council at its meeting of February 11, 2010, asked the Committee to prepare a detailed report with recommendations for presentation at the March 11 Council Meeting. The Committee was asked to review the City’s Application for Extension of Time applicable to the water storage permit, and address water right issues and their relationships with the outlet control structure. Prior to its February meeting, committee members studied copies of the Water Storage Permit document presented during the Council’s meeting of February 11th and the Application for Extension of Time. An additional document (copy attached) was reviewed during the committee’s February 17th meeting as options and possible recommendations were being discussed. It was agreed that John Stead and Richard Koehler would prepare the committee’s report. APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME This application is a request for an extension of time, until October 1, 2012. “Surveys to identify points of diversion have been completed, water meters to record usage have been installed, and a database to track monthly usage has been completed.” [and] The conditions in the permit satisfied: “Initial meter readings recorded at installation. Meters are read monthly and usage information is recorded. Fish passage was provided by the original Output Control Devise” (sic). Cost of the project to date is reported as $77.138.15. Estimated additional cost to complete the project during 2010 – 2011 is $50,000.00. WATER RIGHTS AND THE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE THE BASICS All waters of the State belong to the public for use by the people for beneficial purposes without waste. The Oregon Water Resources Commission, appointed by the Governor, establishes basin standards and establishes policies for operation of the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD). OWRD allocates the public water through the permitting and certification process whereby the right to use the water is allocated to the first person appropriating it for beneficial use. Permits can be converted into water right certificates after the water has been put to beneficial use for least a year. It is wise for eligible permit holders to obtain certificates as soon as possible since permits are subject to change, while certificates are stable and run with the land, subject only to periods of non-use approaching five years or uses inconsistent with the certificate. Over the years residents have pumped water from Woahink Lake, streams, springs and wells for home/domestic use — Favoring the economic efficiencies afforded by individual and community water systems (a system shared by three or more residences). According to the Comprehensive Plan, voters have rejected the creation of a public water system three different times. And people desire to maintain the City as a predominantly rural residential community without the necessity of a municipal water system. MID-COAST BASIN PROGRAM The Water Resources Commission, the Water Resources Board’s replacement, oversees and gives direction to OWRD’s activities while retaining its authority to amend basin programs. On March 26, 1974 theMid-coast basis Program Update was approved based on a 1.5 year study. The domestic use purpose for Woahink Lake was reaffirmed. The waters of Woahink Creek and its tributaries [Woahink Lake] “. . . are classified by the Mid Coast Basin Program as being only for utilization of water for domestic, livestock, irrigation of lawn or noncommercial garden not to exceed one-half acre in area, power development and instream uses for recreation, wildlife, and fish life purposes.” The waters of Woahink Lake are classified, “. . . only for utilization of water for domestic, livestock and in-lake uses for recreation, wildlife, and fish life purposes”. Because water right applications must stipulate the water use classifications specified in the basin Program, Dunes City’s first permit application asked for and obtained its 1968 domestic use permit. Later, at the Water Resources Board’s public hearing in Florence on January 14, 1974, the City requested that the Board revise the Mid-Coast Basin Program to authorize Woahink Lake water for municipal purposes. The Program was amended as follows: “. . . 1.5 cfs of lake water is reserved for municipal purposes and 0.75 cfs for public park purposes.” DUNES CITY’S WATER RIGHT PERMITS The first permit (1968 Priority Date), authorizes 1.4 cfs (cubic feet per second) from Woahink Lake for a public water system to provide water for domestic supplies. This permit was amended in 2005 by adding 217 points of diversion, representing persons who signed a contractual agreement with the City. Use of the City’s permit does not guarantee an amount of water, nor does it authorize the use of water for business or commercial purposes. The City’s Extension of Time Progress Report Form, sent to OWRD April 1, 2009 reported, a total financial investment of $77,138.15 through 2008. The City collects an annual fee of $150 for each of the approximately 135 active diversions for a total annual amount of $20,000. The annual fee is not collected from the estimated 82 contract holders not using water. The second permit (1978 Priority Date), obtained following amendment of the Mid-Coast Basin Program to include municipal purposes, and authorizes 1.5 cfs from Woahink Lake for municipal use. References are made to possible use of the outlet structure and a 10-25-09 letter. The third permit (2004 Priority Date) authorizes storage of 410 acre-feet of water diverted from Woahink Creek and stored in Woahink Lake for multiple purposes during the storage season at times when instream water right demands are being met. Outside the storage season the City shall pass all live flow. A record shall be kept of the amount of water used month. Out of lake water use requires a secondary permit. The fourth permit (2005 Priority Date) authorizes use of the stored water for “creek flow augmentation” and “domestic use expanded” — the diversion of water from 217 different points (the same points listed in the amended 1968 permit). Diversion is allowed only when the City has physical control of the water at the outlet control structure. Storage adjustments will be made and readings from a staff gage in Woahink Creek will be recorded on a regular twice-a-month basis. The Memorandum of Understanding, Item 12, specifies stored water will not be used to satisfy existing rights including the instream water right. HONEYMAN STATE PARK WATER RIGHT CERTIFICATES The Oregon State Highway Commission holds a water right certificate (1958 Priority Date) for the purpose of use in Honeyman State Park. It authorizes 3.45 cfs. A second certificate issued to the Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department (1991 Priority Date) authorizes 0.24 cfs for irrigation and park use. Such use may be made only at times when sufficient water is available to satisfy all prior rights, including rights for maintaining instream flows. WOAHINK CREEK’S INSTREAM WATER RIGHT CERTIFICATE Issued in 1989 with a priority date of 1974, this certificate specifies minimum flow rates for Woahink Creek on a monthly basis and confirms the right to use the waters of the creek to maintain an instream flow for the purposes of supporting aquatic life and recreation. It requires that flows be maintained from the outlet of Woahink Lake to its confluence with Siltcoos Lake. (Flow rates were initially recommended by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.) Based on the doctrine of “prior appropriation”, when creek flow demands are not being met, OWRD can determine that the water supply (Woahink Lake) is over allocated, that water is unavailable, and limit the City’s 1978 municipal permit to human consumption purposes — drinking, cooking and sanitation. WATER AVAILABILITY "Water is Available," means Woahink Lake is not over-appropriated during any period of the proposed use [OAR 690-300-0010(57)]. Woahink Lake is an 820-acre sand dune dammed lake abutting an unconfined aquifer extending from the Siuslaw River to Coos Bay. Its surface is 39 feet above sea level and at its deepest point it is 36 feet below sea level —a crypto-depression with a retention time is 1.2 years. Woahink Lake provides water to meet the needs of Honeyman State Park’s more than 1.5 million visitors per year as well as the park’s irrigation needs. The City’s 1979 Comprehensive Plan, states:
The 2008 Geomorphic and Hydrologic Assessment of Historical Water Level Rise at Cleawox Lake, authored by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (ODGMI), states, “Observed seasonal water level fluctuations ranged from 3 to 6 feet for ground water and 1.5 to 2.0 feet at lakes. Additionally, ground water discharge maintains local lake levels and stream flow; some inflow comes from surface runoff; and surface outlets keep lake levels fairly constant.”
CONSTRAINTS ON WATER AVAILABILITY Water availability is based on the capacity of the resource, in this instance, Woahink Lake. Capacity is a balance of public and private uses — without causing over-appropriation of the resource. Today, over-appropriation means that the quantity of water available in a specified time is insufficient to meet the expected demands from all water rights, including instream water rights, 80 percent of the time. In January 1992, OWRD’s over-appropriation standard was changed from 50 percent to 80 percent exceedance. OWRD then used its water availability model (a statistical model) to predict flow rates in Woahink Creek for comparison with the creek’s instream water right requirements. Creek flows were found to be inadequate to meet water right demands during seven months of the year. In December of 1992, the Lane County’s Public Health Engineer wrote to the Mayor of Dunes City that he supports the City’s efforts towards a city water system and believes, “. . . it would be appropriate for the state Water Resources Commission to limit the granting of new water rights for domestic use to private users within the city limits. This action would prevent the diversion of needed support for the municipal water system to private systems. “ In July 1996, OWRD issued its first permit limiting water availability to domestic use four months and human consumption eight months. Later permits and certificates were limited to human consumption for from seven to twelve months of the year, depending on the water right. Prior water rights were authorized domestic use as specified in the Mid-Coast Basin Program and were conditioned to protect senior rights as follows: “The use confirmed herein is made only at times when sufficient water is available to satisfy all prior rights, including rights for maintaining instream flows.” According to OWRD’s meeting notes of an April 20, 2004 meeting at City Hall with three OWRD staff members, staff advised, “Neither the 50 or 80 percent exceedance factor would allow new live-flow water rights to be issued from Woahink Lake, since water is not available year-round under either standard. Additionally, even if water rights were issued, regulation of water takes place based on real-time data.” Actions such as these created much consternation, discouraged residents from applying for water rights, and created myriad difficulties for realtors and developers who are required by law to notify potential buyers of water availability. During a Water Resources Commission work session on August 8, 2002, a developer from Florence spoke about his concerns about illegal diversions of Woahink Lake water and the need for Dunes City to develop a tax base for a municipal water system. The time consumed by Representative, now Senator, Joanne Verger, OWRD staff, members of the Woahink Lake Association, City Council, Water Quality Control Committee and numerous other persons regarding these matters is incalculable. In 1992 WRD and Dunes City began a collaboration to circumvent the effects of the actions against use of water for domestic purposes. A Woahink Lake Water Rights Community Forum was held on October 29, 2002 at the Florence Events Center. In attendance were eleven staff members from four state agencies and 160 residents, OWRD discouraged potential water right applicants, indicating that use of Dunes City’s 1968 water right is the preferred alternative. OWRD staff member Bob Rice said, “The option for applying for new water rights is possibly not available since there are other options and the water has already been allocated during the months of April through November.” And Tom Paul, OWRD’s Administrator, Field Services Division said, “WRD has no evidence that domestic use has drawn down the lake and the proposed solution will not solve the water flow problem. . . The issue isn’t stream flow, but the fact that people do not have a right to divert water” [Woahink Lake Water Rights Meeting Minutes, October 29, 2002]. On May 6, 2004, OWRD staff met with the Water Quality Control Committee and assured the Committee that OWRD will continue to work with locals to find solutions to problems. ACCESS EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS On September 18, 2001, OWRD sent letters to right permit holders identifying a lack authorization to place “your works” on State of Oregon property and . . . Failure to obtain the necessary easement may result in the cancellation of your permit. . . “ This action was followed by an October 5, 2001 letter from the Oregon Division of Sate Lands (ODSL)\ saying the bed and banks of Woahink Lake are state owned and the Division requires that water pipelines be authorized by easement. The application fee is $750. Subsequently the legislature changed Oregon law to read,
The City’s three applications for authorization to use the City’s water right permit require certification that the applicant owns the land, or has an easement allowing the diversion and/or transport of water over land not owned by the applicant, and without such an authorization the application will not be accepted. The MOU under II. 5., states that the State of Oregon has granted permission for, “ . . . domestic water users holding contracts under Dunes City’s water right permit to occupy state-owned submersible land for . . . diversion and delivery of water. ORS 274.040”. OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OWNERSHIP Woahink Lake was meandered in 1857. All meandered lakes are navigable and public waters. Title to the submersible and submerged land of such meandered lakes is vested in the State of Oregon [ORS 274.430 (1)]. A DSL document states, “The people of Oregon own the submerged and submersible land underlying all navigable streams, rivers, and lakes in most cases up to the ordinary high water line. . . “ In the early 1930’s, according to the Comprehensive Plan, “Woahink Outlet . . . flowed through the lily pond on the west side of Hwy 101 and then turned back east into Siltcoos Lake. The outlet was diverted into a channel east of the highway to save building two bridges.” On October 24, 1939, the State of Oregon obtained an easement over Lot 2 to install, maintain and repair the outlet control with the condition that, should the State fail to operate and properly maintain the outlet control for one year, the easement would terminate. The easement does not specify the outlet control’s location, only that the purpose of the easement was to support its construction and maintenance. In a March 2, 2004 email to John Stead, ODSL’s Greg Willnow stated, “There exists a weir located at the south end, whereby the lake is controlled. The concrete structure was built by a federal works project in the 1930’s. The State Engineer does not allow manipulation of the weir.” According to the meeting notes of an April 20, 2004 meeting at City Hall to discuss with three OWRD staff members, the problem of flows into Woahink Creek being controlled by the outlet control structure, it was reported that, “. . . The state-built outlet-control structure, which Dunes City repaired this past fall is privately owned.” After the State of Oregon abandoned the Outlet Control, the City, by Resolution 11-13-03 (A), authorized funds for its repair and on March 30, 2005 the State of Oregon quitclaimed its interest in Lot 2 to Richard Anderson et al., the current owner of the property underlying the easement.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The application requesting an extension of time is inaccurate and misleading to the extent that it is fatally flawed. It reports activities lacking relevance to the permit and represents that permit conditions have been satisfied (when they have not) and it reports expenses unsupported by facts. 2. Residents of Dunes City and others have suffered ethically, morally and financially from the perplexing application of heavy handed, arbitrary water management. This worrisome situation is the result of inappropriate resistance by OWRD. Holders of water right certificates conditioned to human consumption are out of compliance as are those diverting water without water rights. Persons using the City’s water right permit are out of compliance with the City’s permitting process and paying annual fees of $150, while holders of water rights issued by OWRD are not burdened with any annual fees. 3. Inconsistent standards have arbitrarily been applied to the water management of Woahink Creek and its tributary Woahink Lake. 4. The level of Woahink Lake remains relatively constant as the result of interactions with the unconfined aquifer. 5. Ground water discharge maintains the level of Woahink Lake and the outlet control structure regulates flows into Woahink Creek. 6. ODGMI findings and the City’s Comprehensive Plan support the notion that water use by residents has absolutely no impact on the adequacy of flows in Woahink Creek. These flows are regulated by the outlet control structure (weir). 7. The process of approving applications for use of the City’s water right appears to be flawed. Many applications were approved contrary to the requirement that written authorization to divert and/or transport water [over submerged state land] is required. The requirement is in agreement with ORS 274.040(3)(b) limiting use submerged state land to those holding water rights. Use of the City’s permit does not convey title. While the MOU says contract holders are permitted to use submerged state land, it also states that nothing in the MOD constitutes a valid defense to parties operating in violation of statutes, rules or permits. 8. The City’s water right permit restricts use to water from a natural body of water. Permit number four, authorizes those holding contracts to use the City’s permit to use stored water which is in conflict with the City’s authorization. 9. Access to and ownership of the outlet control structure is vital to fulfilling the conditions of two and possibly three of the water right permits held by the City. Dunes City will have extreme difficulty in obtaining access to and ownership of the outlet control structure. A paper trail establishing ownership does not exist. The City will have extreme difficulty establishing ownership of the outlet control structure. 10. Implementation of the City’s third and fourth water right permits will require regular bi-weekly access to the outlet control structure and a staff gage to be placed in Woahink Creek. After obtaining needed access, the City could install automatic devices for manipulating the outlet control structure and measuring and recording the associated data. However, tt is doubtful that the City will be able to obtain access to the outlet control structure and Woahink Creek.
RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Place a stop work order on any further activities regarding the storage of water or the use of stored water. 2. Give serious consideration to statements implicit with the Comprehensive Plan that discourage the City’s preparations for and implementation of a municipal water system. 3. Survey all Dunes City property owners to determine the level of support for pursuit of a municipal water system for Dunes City. 4. Engage the Water Resources Commission, and members of the Oregon Legislature in efforts to obtain a release of OWRD’s strangle hold on the use of water from Woahink Lake for domestic purpose. Success would enable the City to discontinue its extraction of more than $20,000 annually from selected citizens of Dunes City ($200,000 over ten years) — A noble effort considering current financial conditions. 5. Having another 400 acre feet of water impounded in Woahink Lake might someday be a good idea, however in order to capture that water the city would have to have control of the Outlet Control Structure (OCS). In as much as the City cannot get ownership of the OCS with an easement for repairs and maintenance and because of the Cities limited resources the Water Quality Committee recommends no further action be taken at this time either on the acquisition of the OCS or the storage permit.
[Attachment: Water Quality meeting 3-17-10] OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE / WEIR DISCUSSION WATER QUALITY MEETING February 17, 2010
HISTORY October 9 2003, Weir Impending Failure: In a fragile state and in need of repair before the winter storm period. ODOT has claimed no responsibility for its maintenance. The weir is adjacent to Dick Anderson's property.City’s contingency fund, $3,750 used to make repairs. May 13, 2004, Council took action to proceed with the application to store water. Ward said that Dunes City would work out an arrangement where Dr. Anderson would give the weir to the City along with an easement for access to the weir for maintenance. June 10, 2004, Ward gave the report for the Water Control Committee. John Stead will be filling out the application to the State to add the 6" board to the Woahink Weir. September 9, 2004, City Insurance Services (CIS) investigator will be visiting the site of the Weir to determine liability. CIS would be able to defend the City, but not pay damages. February 10, 2005, Ward said that the permit was received from the Water Resources Department to store water on Woahink Lake using the weir. January 9, 2006, Signed MOU received by the City. -------------------------------------- The permit to store water authorizes the City to construct a reservoir and store the public waters for multiple purposes. Water from Woahink Creek can be diverted to storage October 1 through July 31. Outside the storage season, all live flow must be passed into the creek. Records of the amounts of water used each month must be maintained and reported to WRD annually. --------------------------- EMAIL – (Opinion from DSL) From: YOUNG Cyril Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 1:55 PM To: [councilor Mills email]Subject: RE: Woahink Lake Weir Structure I think I have resolved some of your questions but not all. When Woahink Creek was moved to make way for the Highway 101 construction, that is considered to be an avulsive action and not a natural movement of the creek. At the time that the creek was relocated by ODOT, State ownership would not have moved with the creek, but would have remained with those southern portions of the creek which remained in their original bed. I have reviewed our plat book and other surveys of the lakes and the creek from the early days and compare those to the current Woahink Creek location. The State does not claim the bed and banks of the upper end of Woahink Creek at its current location, it does seem to be in private ownership and if the weir is located with in Parcel 2 or Tax Lot 105 then it is not on state owned lands. . . . ------------------------
DEFINITIONS Avlusive The term "avulsive". At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avulsion_(legal_term) "In real property law, AVULSION refers to a sudden loss or addition to land, which results from the action of water. (emphasis added) It differs from accretion, which describes a gradual loss or addition to land resulting from the action of water." Avulsion “The immediate and noticeable addition to land caused by its removal from the property of another, by a sudden change in a water bed or in the course of a stream. When a stream that is a boundary suddenly abandons its bed and seeks a new bed, the boundary line does not change. It remains in the center of the original bed even if water no longer flows through it. This is known as the rule of avulsion. Avulsion is not the same as accretion or alluvion, the gradual and imperceptible buildup of land by the continuous activity of the sea, a river, or by other natural causes. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 ------------------------------------------- The implication seems to be that the "immediate and noticeable" definition is intended for acts of nature, not man made changes such as the creation of a new channel for the creek incident to road construction. ------------------- ORS 274.025 Jurisdiction over submersible and submerged lands generally. (1) The title to the submersible and submerged lands of all navigable streams and lakes in this state now existing or which may have been in existence in 1859 when the state was admitted to the Union, or at any time since admission, and which has not become vested in any person, is vested in the State of Oregon. The State of Oregon is the owner of the submersible and submerged lands of such streams and lakes, and may use and dispose of the same as provided by law. ------------------- 274.005 Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context requires otherwise: (7) “Submerged lands,” except as provided in ORS 274.705, means lands lying below the line of ordinary low water of all navigable waters within the boundaries of this state as heretofore or hereafter established, whether such waters are tidal or nontidal.
Additional attachment - Application for extension R14131 20100202.pdf 18pp
REPORT SUMMARY
WATER RIGHT ISSUES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
March 11, 2010
Scrivener’s Errors: Page 5, Last paragraph, first sentence: Delete the first two words, “In 1992”. Page 8, Item 10. last sentence: Substitute “it” for “tt”. Item 11, last sentence: Substitute “City’s” for “Cities”. Summary: The Report provides detailed information supporting the following recommendations: 1. Place a stop work order on any further activities regarding the storage of water or the use of stored water. The City’s permits for storage (2004) and use of water (2005) from Woahink Creek allow those already using the City’s 1968 water right permit to also use stored water for domestic purposes when the City has physical control of the water. There appears to be a lack of benefit for the City. These permits require that the City have bi-weekly access to the outlet control structure (weir). Ownership of the weir has not been established nor has access been provided, thus preventing the City from moving forward; and making the application for an extension of time to implement the storage permit a futile effort. 2. Give serious consideration to statements implicit with the Comprehensive Plan that discourage the City’s preparations for and implementation of a municipal water system. The City’s 1968 and 1978 permits authorize use of Woahink Lake water for a public water system. Voters have denied a public water system three different times, favoring the economic efficiencies afforded by individual and community water systems. 3. Survey all Dunes City property owners to determine the level of support for pursuit of a municipal water system for Dunes City. Results from such a survey would be useful in guiding Council deliberations concerning pursuit of a municipal water system.
4. Engage the Water Resources Commission, and members of the Oregon Legislature in efforts to obtain a release of OWRD’s strangle hold on the use of water from Woahink Lake for domestic purpose. Success would enable the City to discontinue its extraction of more than $20,000 annually from selected citizens of Dunes City ($200,000 over ten years) — A noble effort considering current financial conditions. Residents and others suffer from the perplexing application of water management by OWRD. Those holders of water rights conditioned to human consumption (in home use) are out of compliance water users as are those diverting water without permits.
Persons using the City’s water right permit appear to lack the City required authorization for use of submerged state land, have no guarantee of water availability and pay an annual fee. In contrast, holders of water rights issued by OWRD are automatically authorized to use submerged state land, are guaranteed a specific water flow subject only to appropriation by senior water right holders, and are not subject to annual fees.
[ back ] [ top ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||